Received: from 5JZ0VhOjytEvUaOjpO8B9WadjVJdiMN51VwYLb56iVk= (Du66wbFMPsvL2/1+6x7rK513ChmmFG9S) by webmail.veebimajutus.ee with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 17 May 2021 10:43:20 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:43:20 +0300 From: Margus To: delegationNATO@mfa.ee, shapepao@shape.nato.int, margus.meigo@eesti.ee Bcc: pao@jallc.nato.int, jallc@jallc.nato.int, MOC@hq.nato.int, kodukaitse@online.ee Subject: Reports that the c2coe & thoughts about citizen defense education tools. Reply-To: margus.meigo@eesti.ee User-Agent: Veebimajutus.ee Webmail/1.4.0 Message-ID: <7b3b03d446ff7fe12d0cec169d689e84@linnapea.ee> X-Sender: Margus@linnapea.ee Organization: Abok Return-Receipt-To: Margus Disposition-Notification-To: Margus Greetings humble servants of world security. Facebook reports that the "c2coe.org" - "The Command and Control Centre of Excellence (NATO C2COE)" website, Command and Control (C2) Subject Matter Experts for Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) portal is spam or fake abusive website, and posting any links from them is forbidden (https://ibb.co/Mk92r6G / https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJZtLI9cMY ). That might not be much of an important and temporary error, but in case it is a matter of importance, I will extend the topic. I Will mention upfront, we do our best for making "down to earth" simple hybrid solutions to this kind of issue (in where people need rapid human-AI response related to data or website to legitimatize and happenings ). For anyone interested in the outcome or provide trusted human resources for the work, would inspire for even better work. Also for a central identify portal where chat-partners and people over the internet can certify one another virtual or real profile (on the current session, without any add-ons to communication lines where is communicated). Also on c2coe own page, ex: https://c2coe.org/e-portal/seminar2019/lessons/c2-policy-for-peacekeeping-operations-mr-jonathan-robinson/ The link: "C2 CommunityJoin the Discussion" link produces: " Forbidden: You don't have permission to access this resource. " And when looking at the URL Registrar info, who would not know, that Rijksoverheid means "Government of the Netherlands", then all these parked not working websites (https://kodukaitsekeskus.blogspot.com/p/rijksoverheid-and-c2coeorg-facebook.html), with possible serious fake-to-be organization names, would also raise alarms on average people mind. Questions: 1. What are free or paid tools and portals-registers, for the layman, AI, and professionals to "ask about gov/all" website legitimatize. 2. What are the correct emails-contacts to where direct questions about NATO, US-Mil, and other defense-gov-related websites legitimate, and errors can be sent when webmaster contacts are not present. 3. What are the chances for GDPR & ICANN-related disputes to be resolved so humans can access even deeper and better WHois information about website owners, for research about legitimate connections. 4. What other methods would You recommend, for rapid and response proof research about website legitimacy, security, and internet posts that say to be from one or another organization. Also, in places where people can drop info anonymously, AI s are perfectly able in instant to analyze and sort most of the spam out and save the rest of it to archive. __ Ending thought, Not mandatory to read, about hypothetical scenarios and common worry's in technology science-fiction border confused society: Commons citizen tools and methods are also needed for people to at least on some level, test if their district internet is hijacked in a "virtual container" in where all the outcry is newer sent out to another country but is in a closed-loop, not answered by the actual people from actual websites but by some other forces not intended to. As it was fear with social-websites for a time where theoretically was possible to inject into actual web-browsing session hybrid controlled website experience, in where it looked like a true full website. But only some contacts comments in this hypothetical situation were redirected to an actual internet (or redirected with delay, after it was "approved") but the rest of it was sand-boxed and controlled, managed by a third party without people and website knowledge. The common thing also is, for these scenarios, that comments are marked by controllers by special smiles or first rapid response that will set the sensor level or tone for the rest of the organized trolls to follow with the attack or approval. There was also worry for people that other sides, actually saw another kind of messages than they posted or sent. Also, in the middle of the conversation, the chat was hijacked to separate new contacts from one another and stop the information exchange. A common worry is also, that software update callbacks are infiltrated and the backdoor version of the software will be downloaded into devices or OS. Also, after the Official Opera browser who rejected to use of security threats and bugs as features, they were forced into Chrome core, most of the internet browsing is controlled by organizations who are dear to a pentagram/star as Chrome and Firefox as well, seem to be under Alfa-Bet(Russia-USA) influence many ways. That should be originally good sing, but recent five years development have shown many strange hypothetical dangers in it related to possibility, that browsers are keeping some "features" open and influence major websites to use technology that requires a browser to be unsafe and possibly totally controllable by totally other means than the standards by what they are tested that are presented to the public. Most of the worry related to it is most likely unreasonable these day's when transparency and information awareness is on the rise but people still need to know, how they can know about this kind of most basic information that needs extreme technical-scientific expertise to produce quality control to main products with simple to understand consents and tools for people to look up, report, discuss and get the insured feeling that our reality is safe. The answer should not be for every human issue "go google it" .. but there should be, related to some tools some central commands that people know, are testable daily many ways by alternative communication and radio verification methods. It is late to develop consciousness and education about it when it's late. For now, the world has been kind to us, so it's not so late jet. Snails can not race with antelopes. More control & more freedom, reality-based safety: Internet for sure must become even freer and information-rich, but same time we should also have safe, secure data-centers and information crossroads, on to what people can depend on, and about what people can and should be educated about. For example rare when people know, that .int domain websites are much different in legitimate level compared to .info. We are on the age when near future GPT-3 / GPT4 + AI in combination with robots s are perfectly able to make with human instructions the massive amount of "near similar" websites and portals and if not able to cheat the official structure they might still be able to confuse people a lot, with the mixed more professional propaganda campaign, to invoke some emotion and reaction from people. Or agitate other machines. This email is from Open Source Defense, OSINT initiative. Time Defence Margus Meigo