Subject: Reports that the c2coe & thoughts about citizen defense education tools.
From: Margus <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:43:20 +0300

Greetings humble servants of world security.

Facebook reports that the "c2coe.org" - "The Command and Control Centre 
of Excellence (NATO C2COE)" website, Command and Control (C2) Subject 
Matter Experts for Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) portal 
is spam or fake abusive website,
  and posting any links from them is forbidden (https://ibb.co/Mk92r6G / 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJZtLI9cMY ).

That might not be much of an important and temporary error, but in case 
it is a matter of importance, I will extend the topic.

I Will mention upfront, we do our best for making "down to earth" simple 
hybrid solutions to this kind of issue (in where people need rapid 
human-AI response related to data or website to legitimatize and 
happenings ). For anyone interested in the outcome or provide trusted 
human resources for the work, would inspire for even better work.
Also for a central identify portal where chat-partners and people over 
the internet can certify one another virtual or real profile (on the 
current session, without any add-ons to communication lines where is 
communicated).

Also on c2coe own page, ex:
https://c2coe.org/e-portal/seminar2019/lessons/c2-policy-for-peacekeeping-operations-mr-jonathan-robinson/
The link: "C2 CommunityJoin the Discussion" link produces: " Forbidden: 
You don't have permission to access this resource. "

And when looking at the URL Registrar info,  who would not know, that 
Rijksoverheid means "Government of the Netherlands", then all these 
parked not working websites 
(https://kodukaitsekeskus.blogspot.com/p/rijksoverheid-and-c2coeorg-facebook.html), 
with possible serious fake-to-be organization names, would also raise 
alarms on average people mind.

Questions:
1. What are free or paid tools and portals-registers, for the layman, 
AI, and professionals to "ask about gov/all" website legitimatize.
2. What are the correct emails-contacts to where direct questions about 
NATO, US-Mil, and other defense-gov-related websites legitimate, and 
errors can be sent when webmaster contacts are not present.
3. What are the chances for GDPR & ICANN-related disputes to be resolved 
so humans can access even deeper and better WHois information about 
website owners, for research about legitimate connections.
4. What other methods would You recommend, for rapid and response proof 
research about website legitimacy, security, and internet posts that say 
to be from one or another organization.

Also, in places where people can drop info anonymously, AI s are 
perfectly able in instant to analyze and sort most of the spam out and 
save the rest of it to archive.

__

Ending thought,
Not mandatory to read, about
hypothetical scenarios and common worry's
in technology science-fiction border confused society:

Commons citizen tools and methods are also needed for people to at least 
on some level, test if their district internet is hijacked in a "virtual 
container" in where all the outcry is newer sent out to another country 
but is in a closed-loop, not answered by the actual people from actual 
websites but by some other forces not intended to. As it was fear with 
social-websites for a time where theoretically was possible to inject 
into actual web-browsing session hybrid controlled website experience, 
in where it looked like a true full website. But only some contacts 
comments in this hypothetical situation were redirected to an actual 
internet (or redirected with delay, after it was "approved") but the 
rest of it was sand-boxed and controlled, managed by a third party 
without people and website knowledge.

The common thing also is, for these scenarios, that comments are marked 
by controllers by special smiles or first rapid response that will set 
the sensor level or tone for the rest of the organized trolls to follow 
with the attack or approval. There was also worry for people that other 
sides, actually saw another kind of messages than they posted or sent. 
Also, in the middle of the conversation, the chat was hijacked to 
separate new contacts from one another and stop the information 
exchange.

A common worry is also, that software update callbacks are infiltrated 
and the backdoor version of the software will be downloaded into devices 
or OS. Also, after the Official Opera browser who rejected to use of 
security threats and bugs as features, they were forced into Chrome 
core, most of the internet browsing is controlled by organizations who 
are dear to a pentagram/star as Chrome and Firefox as well, seem to be 
under Alfa-Bet(Russia-USA) influence many ways.
That should be originally good sing, but recent five years development 
have shown many strange hypothetical dangers in it related to 
possibility, that browsers are keeping some "features" open and 
influence major websites to use technology that requires a browser to be 
unsafe and possibly totally controllable by totally other means than the 
standards by what they are tested that are presented to the public.

Most of the worry related to it is most likely unreasonable these day's 
when transparency and information awareness is on the rise but people 
still need to know, how they can know about this kind of most basic 
information that needs extreme technical-scientific expertise to produce 
quality control to main products with simple to understand consents and 
tools for people to look up, report, discuss and get the insured feeling 
that our reality is safe.

The answer should not be for every human issue "go google it" .. but 
there should be, related to some tools some central commands that people 
know, are testable daily many ways by alternative communication and 
radio verification methods. It is late to develop consciousness and 
education about it when it's late.

For now, the world has been kind to us, so it's not so late jet. Snails 
can not race with antelopes.

More control & more freedom, reality-based safety:
Internet for sure must become even freer and information-rich, but same 
time we should also have safe, secure data-centers and information 
crossroads, on to what people can depend on, and about what people can 
and should be educated about. For example rare when people know, that 
.int domain websites are much different in legitimate level compared to 
.info.

We are on the age when near future GPT-3 / GPT4 + AI in combination with 
robots s are perfectly able to make with human instructions the massive 
amount of "near similar" websites and portals and if not able to cheat 
the official structure they might still be able to confuse people a lot, 
with the mixed more professional propaganda campaign, to invoke some 
emotion and reaction from people.
Or agitate other machines.

This email is from Open Source Defense, OSINT initiative.

Time Defence
Margus Meigo